Loading
PDBj
MenuPDBj@FacebookPDBj@X(formerly Twitter)PDBj@BlueSkyPDBj@YouTubewwPDB FoundationwwPDBDonate
RCSB PDBPDBeBMRBAdv. SearchSearch help

4HTK

Mitigation of X-ray damage in macromolecular crystallography by submicrometer line focusing; total dose 2.17 x 10e+12 X-ray photons

Summary for 4HTK
Entry DOI10.2210/pdb4htk/pdb
Related4HTN 4HTQ
DescriptorLysozyme C, CHLORIDE ION, SODIUM ION, ... (5 entities in total)
Functional Keywordshydrolase, o-glycosyl, glycosidase, cytoplasm (white)
Biological sourceGallus gallus (bantam,chickens)
Cellular locationSecreted: P00698
Total number of polymer chains1
Total formula weight14823.98
Authors
Duke, N.E.C.,Finfrock, Y.Z.,Stern, E.A.,Alkire, R.W.,Lazarski, K.,Joachimiak, A. (deposition date: 2012-11-01, release date: 2013-05-15, Last modification date: 2024-11-06)
Primary citationFinfrock, Y.Z.,Stern, E.A.,Alkire, R.W.,Kas, J.J.,Evans-Lutterodt, K.,Stein, A.,Duke, N.,Lazarski, K.,Joachimiak, A.
Mitigation of X-ray damage in macromolecular crystallography by submicrometre line focusing.
Acta Crystallogr.,Sect.D, 69:1463-1469, 2013
Cited by
PubMed Abstract: Reported here are measurements of the penetration depth and spatial distribution of photoelectron (PE) damage excited by 18.6 keV X-ray photons in a lysozyme crystal with a vertical submicrometre line-focus beam of 0.7 µm full-width half-maximum (FWHM). The experimental results determined that the penetration depth of PEs is 5 ± 0.5 µm with a monotonically decreasing spatial distribution shape, resulting in mitigation of diffraction signal damage. This does not agree with previous theoretical predication that the mitigation of damage requires a peak of damage outside the focus. A new improved calculation provides some qualitative agreement with the experimental results, but significant errors still remain. The mitigation of radiation damage by line focusing was measured experimentally by comparing the damage in the X-ray-irradiated regions of the submicrometre focus with the large-beam case under conditions of equal exposure and equal volumes of the protein crystal, and a mitigation factor of 4.4 ± 0.4 was determined. The mitigation of radiation damage is caused by spatial separation of the dominant PE radiation-damage component from the crystal region of the line-focus beam that contributes the diffraction signal. The diffraction signal is generated by coherent scattering of incident X-rays (which introduces no damage), while the overwhelming proportion of damage is caused by PE emission as X-ray photons are absorbed.
PubMed: 23897469
DOI: 10.1107/S0907444913009335
PDB entries with the same primary citation
Experimental method
X-RAY DIFFRACTION (1.2 Å)
Structure validation

236963

PDB entries from 2025-06-04

PDB statisticsPDBj update infoContact PDBjnumon
OSZAR »